Sleep Apnea

Question

 This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Ideas 20 pts Ideas are clear, insightful, thought provoking, and focused so that they consistently support the topic, thesis, and audience of the paper. 13 pts Ideas are clear and focused to support the topic and a clearly stated central idea but are not consistently insightful or thought provoking. 7 pts Ideas are clear but conventional or general and support the topic, thesis, and audience for the paper. 5 pts Ideas are unclear or clichéd and demonstrate a lack of focus in support of the topic or a central idea, which might be vague or missing. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Assignment Development 20 pts Development is fresh, with abundant details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific and insightful evidence in support of sound logic. 13 pts Development is adequate but might lack depth, with details and examples that arouse audience interest and provide relevant, concrete, specific evidence in support of sound logic. 7 pts Development is sufficient but general, providing adequate but perhaps not interesting details, examples, and evidence that include no logical fallacies or unsupported claims. 5 pts Development is insufficient, providing scarce or inappropriate details, evidence, and examples that might include logical fallacies or unsupported claims. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organization 20 pts Organization is coherent, unified, and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/plan and consistently demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs. Full Marks 13 pts Organization is coherent, unified, and effective in support of the paper’s purpose/plan and usually demonstrates effective and appropriate rhetorical transitions between ideas and paragraphs. 7 pts Organization is coherent and unified overall in support of the essay’s purpose/plan, but is ineffective at times and might demonstrate abrupt or weak transitions between ideas or paragraphs. 5 pts Organization is confused and fragmented in support of the essay’s purpose/plan and demonstrates a lack of structure or coherence that negatively affects readability. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Style and Mechanics 20 pts Style is readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, precise word choice, and correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. (Mastery of style) 13 pts Style is readable and rhetorically effective in tone, incorporating varied sentence structure, effective word choice, and correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. (Effective style) 7 pts Style is readable but unremarkable in tone, sometimes including a lack of sentence variety effective word choice, or some distracting, but not serious, errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. (Readable but inconsistent style) 5 pts Style is incoherent or inappropriate in tone, including a lack of sentence variety, ineffective or inappropriate word choice, and serious errors in grammar, spelling, and punctuation. (Ineffective style) 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Format and Citations 20 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works expertly to support the paper’s purpose/plan. All resources are formatted in current APA style with no more than two errors. 13 pts Format is correct, meets all assignment directions, and works generally to support the paper’s purpose/plan. All resources are formatted in current APA style with three to five errors. 7 pts Format is mostly correct, meets critical aspects of assignment directions, and works mostly to support the paper’s purpose/plan. Most resources are formatted in current APA style with more than five errors. 5 pts Format is faulty, does not meet sufficient aspects of the assignment direction, and does not support the paper’s purpose/plan. Resources are not formatted in APA style with extensive errors. 20 pts Total Points: 100